Login
Login
  • Home
  • News & Events
  • Contact Us
  • Statistics Publications
  • Dashboards
  • Samoa Stats Portal - SSP
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / WSM-SBS-DHS-2009-V1 / variable [F4]
central

Samoa Demographic and Health Survey 2009

Samoa, 2009
Get Microdata
Reference ID
WSM-SBS-DHS-2009-v1
Producer(s)
Samoa Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Health
Metadata
Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON
Created on
May 20, 2025
Last modified
May 26, 2025
Page views
9693
  • Study Description
  • Data Dictionary
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Data files
  • QHSEC01
  • QHSEC02
  • QHSEC03
  • SamDHS09rcdWN

Year of start of use of method (V316)

Data file: SamDHS09rcdWN

Overview

Valid: 0
Invalid: 0
Type: Discrete
Decimal: 0
Start: 352
End: 355
Width: 4
Format: Numeric

Description

Definition
Year started using a contraceptive method by the respondent or her current partner (see note on imputed dates). This variable now occupies 4 digits.

Others

Notes
Imputed Dates

For key events in the respondent's life, dates have been imputed when the full date of the event was not provided by the respondent or in some cases if dates are inconsistent (e.g. less than 7 months between births). These events are the date of birth of the respondent, the date of first union or marriage, the date of birth of each child of the respondent, the date of conception of the current pregnancy (based on the duration of pregnancy), the date of start of use of current method, and. For each of these dates only the imputed data are available in the recode data file, but a date flag has been included in the file to show what format the information was in prior to imputation, and what basis was used for the imputation. The codes for this date flag are as follows:

1 Both month and year of the event were specified and so no imputation was necessary.
2 The year of the event was not given, but the month of the event and the age of the respondent or child or, in the case of the date of first union, the respondent's age at first union were specified. In most cases this information uniquely identifies the exact date of the event. In a few cases the year of the event was imputed from a choice of two possible years.
3 The year of the event, but not the month, and the age of the respondent or child or, in the case of the date of first union, the respondent's age at first union were specified and only the month of the event was imputed.
4 The year of birth, but not the month, and the age of the respondent or child were specified. However, in surveys where it is believed the year of birth is calculated from the age, the year of birth is ignored when the year of birth plus the age add up to the year of interview.
5 The year of the event was given but the month of the event was not specified, and neither was the age. The month of the event was imputed.
6 Neither the month nor the year of the event was specified, but age was given and the year and month of the event were imputed from the age.
7 Only the month of the event was given, without the year or age. The year of the event was imputed from other information. (For current pregnancy, duration of pregnancy was given.)
8 No information was given concerning the date of the event. But month and year of the event were imputed from other information. (For current pregnancy, duration of pregnancy was not given.)
For the date of conception of the current pregnancy only codes 7 and 8 are used. The date of interview is required to be fully specified in all cases and so no imputation is necessary for this variable and no format flag exists for the date of interview.

A full description of the imputation process is given in the DHS Data Processing Manual.
Back to Catalog
Samoa Microdata Library

© Samoa Microdata Library, All Rights Reserved.